# Multi-goal Optimization

Investors are often must decide whether to consider absolute return and risk, or relative return and risk. Sophisticated investors, however, employ optimization in an attempt to be sensitive to both. Many address this dual concern of absolute and relative return and risk by *constraining* the asset weights in the optimization process, which is time-consuming and produces sub-optimal portfolios.

Imagine for a moment, a new approach. An approach that allows investors to simultaneously consider absolute and relative performance, yields a higher expected return, in a more efficient process. Here at Windham Labs, we offer an innovative optimization technique: Multi-goal Optimization.

![An Efficient Surface](/files/-MG5NTp2STtl3Mz-vSzQ)

Multi-goal Optimization combines mean-variance analysis, which characterizes assets and portfolios by their expected *absolute* return and standard deviation, with tracking error—which gives a measurement of the volatility of relative returns. This technique allows investors to identify efficient allocations that consider both absolute and relative performance. Rather than producing an efficient frontier in two dimensions, Multi-goal Optimization produces an efficient surface in three dimensions: expected return, standard deviation, and tracking error.

### Benefits of Multi-goal Optimization

Multi-goal optimization typically yields an expected result that is superior to constrained mean-variance optimization.

* For a given *expected return*, multi-goal optimization produces a portfolio with a lower standard deviation and less tracking error<br>
* For a given *standard deviation*, multi-goal optimization produces a portfolio with a higher expected return and less tracking error<br>
* For a given *tracking error*, multi-goal optimization produces a portfolio with a higher expected return and lower standard deviation

{% hint style="info" %}
Higher expected return, lower standard deviation, less tracking error
{% endhint %}

Multi-goal Optimization not only identifies allocations that are efficient based simultaneously on expected absolute and relative performance, but also estimates return distributions in both absolute and relative dimensions. Analysis of joint-probability distributions generated by Multi-goal Optimization allow the investor to minimize the likelihood of failing to achieve an absolute target, while at the same time underperforming a benchmark.

The traditional approach of imposing allocation constraints on the mean-variance optimization process is an inefficient way to address  performance goals. Multi-goal Optimization, which encompasses both absolute and relative measures of risk in an unconstrained optimization process, typically produces a **superior solution** through a **more efficient** process.

## Video Presentation

To help visualize this concept, play the video presentation below

{% embed url="<https://www.windhamlabs.com/videos/multi-goal-optimization.mp4>" %}
Multi-goal Optimization
{% endembed %}


---

# Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation

If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:

```
GET https://insights.windhamlabs.com/portfolio-construction/multi-goal-optimization.md?ask=<question>
```

The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.
